#FOOTBALL MANAGER 2005 GAMESPOT SERIES#
Thus, if the series article can exist as "xxxx" while all games in the series are "yyyy n", then the series article should remain without the "(series)" ( Ace Attorney vs Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney). Given naming policy, one should not really add a disambiguation to an article name unless it is necessary. If there's a naming conflict between the series name and the first game of the series ( Ratchet and Clank vs Ratchet and Clank (series)), the series page should always be "xxxx (series)" (or "xxxx (video game series)" should there be confliect) the first game should never be disambiguated unless there's further naming conflict, at which point the first game should be "xxxx (video game)". What about it? Should a article covering a video game series derieved from a game with the same name (for example Age of Empires series/video game) be named "xxxx (series)", "xxxx series" or just "xxxx"? Should both articles be disambiged? Or just one of them? If so, which? - MrStalker talk 08:46, 21 September 2007 (UTC) I would argue off the bat thay any "xxxx series" is bad form it should be either "xxxx (series)" or "xxxx", depending.
#FOOTBALL MANAGER 2005 GAMESPOT HOW TO#
We need some sort of rules for how to title video game articles, I'm seeing articles not being consistant in naming because it's no strict rules on this. I feel that it's a naming convention for video game articles missing. MrStalker talk 13:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC) Video games naming convention User:Krator ( t c) 18:04, 23 September 2007 (UTC) I know that, thus the subpage of Article guidelines. This page is too short for it's own policy page. Subpage is unnecessary and will only make the page less accessible. Proposed Merge: Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines